Speeding Ticket Secret #3

A Clever Way to Beat Your Ticket

FINALLY REVEALED: How 12,276 people exploited the
traffic court system by using the method you see below.

Here's the moment you've been waiting for. This is the defense strategy sure to get you out of your speeding ticket.

But first, a word of caution - don't let the simplicity of this next strategy fool you. This is by far, the ONLY sure fire way to beat a ticket. Period!

Okay, here we go...

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to go to court and request certain documents from the officer. Documents, that if not produced, will force the judge to dismiss your case.

There are only a few to ask for, but they MUST be requested in a particular order.

These documents you'll be asking for lay proper foundation for the charge against you. Once you ask for these documents, the officer has a legal obligation to present them because they are relevant to the case.

Remember from Secret #2, the officer has to not only testify that you were speeding, but he also has to submit proof!

This is all you're doing, asking for proof. You want more than just his verbal testimony.

Take This Example:

Let's say Frank is being charged with murder. The prosecutor can stand up in court all day long and say that Frank is a murderer. But it means absolutely nothing without hard physical proof.

In order for Frank to be convicted of murder, the prosecutor is going to need a heck of a lot more than just accusations. He needs a weapon, motive, and a dead body... all crucial pieces of evidence.

The same is true with you. In order for you to be convicted of speeding, the prosecutor is going to need a lot more than just the officer's accusations. He needs hard physical evidence.

But, there's one small catch... YOU have to ask for it. The officer does NOT have to automatically submit proof in order for you to be found guilty. You can still be convicted without them.

How? Easy... because you never gave the judge any reason to dismiss your case.

This is why the vast majority of people fighting traffic tickets these days are found guilty. Very RARELY is the officer ever asked to submit any evidence in court.

Most people going to court are only there to tell their side of the story or accuse the officer of making a mistake. They're not there to put up much of a defense.

Believe it or not... this is GREAT news to you!

Since most defendants never ask for proof of their guilt, actual proof is seldom brought to court. And by using the Traffic Ticket Secrets method of fighting your speeding ticket, you are going to take full advantage of this.

While on the stand, the officer's whole case against you goes as follows, "I caught the defendant speeding with my radar gun. And the radar gun was calibrated and accurate at the time I used it." That's about it.

Although you were innocent when you walked into court, once the officer said he caught you speeding with a reliable method of speed capture, you quickly go from innocent to guilty.

The judge will then render his decision based on the officer's testimony.

But remember this equation...
No Proof = No Case!!

Our legal system requires substantial evidence to a crime before a defendant can be found guilty. In order for you to be convicted, the prosecution MUST present enough evidence to prove you did in fact exceed the speed limit and you were caught with a reliable form of speed capture.

The officer's testimony that the radar gun (or laser gun) was accurate and functioning properly can never be proven because neither he nor the prosecutor have brought the appropriate documents to back it up... assuming you ask for them of course.

Your defense strategy will be focused on their lack of effort. You'll trap them in an ambush they can't get out of.

Because they fail to supply what you're asking for, they don't have the proof needed to convict you. Unless they can bring forth this evidence, neither the police officer nor the prosecutor can legally prove you're guilty of speeding.

As a result, your case WILL BE dismissed!

"If these documents are so crucial
to the prosecutor's case, why
doesn't he bring them with him?"

There are two good reasons for this. First, as we have aleady established, most people only go to court to give excuses... not to properly defend themselves. As such, the prosecution is rarely ever asked for these documents, so the prosecutor doesn't bring them.

Secondly, on any given day, a traffic court can have up to 50 people contesting their speeding tickets. And for all of these defendants, there's usually only ONE prosecutor to handle these cases.

Imagine if the courts were to prepare a solid case against each and every person they prosecuted. By solid, I mean actually taking the time and energy to research, develop and bring ALL the relevant documents that pertain to each individual. Not only that, but making certain these documents have been thoroughly reviewed for accuracy.

The Cost Of Doing This Would Be Too Expensive!

They'd have to pay the prosecutor over time and possibly hire another one. They'd have to hire additional case filers, paralegals, secretaries and court clerks to handle the extra workload... essentially cutting into their profits substantially.

I can assure you, this is NOT on the courts "To Do" List.

The courts do know what should be brought to court in order to establish concrete proof of guilt. They're also well aware of who I am and the damaging information I expose. But I'm only one person with one website and it may take years before the general driving population finally catches on to these strategies.

Until that time arrives, traffic courts are more than willing to take their chances that 99% of people who try to defend themselves will not know these secrets. And they're absolutely right!

The one or two who do walk into court with these tactics and win their case will be accepted as a loss. But the courts will still continue to count the millions of dollars they make from the rest of the defendants who always lose their case.

"That sounds great, but what
if the judge says the officer
doesn't have to supply this evidence?"

This is where most people fail. The few that do come to court prepared, come prepared with only half a defense. They don't know how to respond when something like this occurs.

If the judge or prosecutor says something to the effect the evidence you are requesting is not important, simply give the judge a friendly smile and hand him a special document that I will supply you.

This document (which comes from the highest state courts, State Supreme Courts) clearly says that if a defendant should request any type of evidence from the officer, the officer is obligated to provide it!

It also declares if the police officer can not...

...a dismissal should be rendered to the defendant!

It acts as a good slap in the face and reminds the judge and prosecutor of who's really boss in that courtroom. They can NOT go against a ruling from a State Supreme Court!

The judge will then have NO choice but to turn to the officer and ask him if he has brought the evidence you request. When he says "no"... CASE DISMISSED!

It really is as easy as that. It all depends on whether or not you know what to ask for - and what to bring with you.

"What will the trial be like?"

Your time in the courtroom will be swift, and I mean fast. The entire trial usually takes about 5 minutes.

Here's a good example of how a speeding ticket trial will be...

A Typical Court Trial

Your case will be called and the officer will take the stand. The prosecutor will give his direct examination a little like this...

PROSECUTOR: Officer, please state your name and spell out your last name for the record.

OFFICER: My name is Officer Gerald Higgins, H I G G I N S.

PROSECUTOR: How are you employed with the city of Miami and for how long have you been employed in this position?

OFFICER: I am a police officer for the city of Miami and have been so since 1998.

PROSECUUTOR: On July 15, 2008 did you issue a speeding ticket, citation number VC3-009-87?

OFFICER: Yes.

PROSECUTOR: And to whom did you issue this citation to?

OFFICER: I issued this citation to the defendant, Mary L. Wadsworth.

PROSECUTOR: And what was the reason for issuing this citation?

OFFICER: I issued Mrs. Wadsworth this citation because on the date in question, I was situated on the median of Highway I-95 conducting traffic enforcement. I was targeting the Northbound traffic and had observed the defendant's vehicle, a silver Ford Taurus, license plate DRG-7861 travelling at a high rate of speed, clearly passing all the other vehicles. I then used my radar gun to confirm her speed which was calculated at 85 mph. The speed limit on that particular section of I-95 is 65 mph.

PROSECUTOR: I see, and to your knowledge was the radar gun functioning properly and accurately calculating speeds at the moment you used it on the defendant?

OFFICER: Yes.

PROSECUTOR: How can you be so sure?

OFFICER: Before starting my shift that day, I pushed the internal test mechanism and the preprogrammed speed of 50 mph displayed on the screen. I also checked the accuracy of the machine by testing it with the 3 tuning forks issued to it. Each time the test came up positive for accurate readings.

PROSECUTOR: Should the radar guns internal machanisms fail, would there be any sign or indication that the radar gun has malfunctioned? And if so, did you receive such indication on the day in question?

OFFICER: If the machine were to fail, it would either start fluctuating, remain at a speed of 0 or stop functioning altogether. None of these happened on the day in question.

PROSECUTOR: With regards to the radar gun, what kind of training have you had?

OFFICER: (Now he'll ramble on and on about how much training he has and how great he is.)

PROSECUTOR: Thank you, officer. No further questions Your Honor.

JUDGE: Mrs. Wadsworth, you may question the officer or take the stand if you wish.

DEFENDANT: Thank you Your Honor. I'll just question the officer.

DEFENDANT: Officer, please submit to the court Document #1.

He either has it or he doesn't. If he doesn't, CASE DISMISSED! If he does have it, continue.

DEFENDANT: Thank you, Officer. Please submit Document #2.

This document, (Document #2) is rarely ever brought to court. Most cases end right here. If he doesn't have it (75 to 90% chance he doesn't).... CASE DISMISSED! If he does have it, continue.

DEFENDANT: Thank you, Officer. Lastly please submit Document #3.

I'm willing to bet my house and kids that he doesn't have this document... CASE DISMISSED!

*******************************************************************

Each one of these documents you are asking for are extremely crucial to the officer's case against you. Without these documents, the officer's testimony means absolutely nothing.

By the way, I'll show you a legal tactic that would have allowed you to beat your ticket even after Document #1 was submitted as evidence. Not only that, I'll also show you how to avoid cross examining the police officer altogether.

You'll discover how to find out these and many more tricks of the trade along with the identity of the three documents above on the next page...

So, to sum things up a bit...

...your main goal is to ask the prosecution for something essential to the case, but doesn't have!

Once you've accomplished this, the speeding ticket is completely worthless.

With no other evidence to present and no other avenue to turn, the prosecutor will motion for a dismissal. He has to, because he's exhausted all his options at this point. And besides, there are other people waiting to have their case heard.

Just think what would happen if everyone else in the courtroom did the same thing you just did? It would be catastrophic for the court. Instead, both the judge and prosecutor will want to get on with the rest of the day's proceedings.

They'll accept your one case as a loss and move on.

Did you know traffic cops have the highest rate of testicular cancer in the world? This is because many of them put the radar gun in their lap without first shutting it off. And who says cops don't have any balls?

I hope by now you see the simplicity of it all. This is just a traffic ticket, so the prosecutor and police officer don't do much to prepare their case.

Actually, they don't do anything at all!

Take advantage of that. Your trial will be over in a matter of minutes if you use this strategy of attacking the evidence.

They're assuming you will be like the rest of the people they prosecute on a regular basis. Therefore, they're also assuming the lousy evidence (if any) they have against you will hold up in court as it has in the past.

If only they knew.

And now for the Ultimate Secret...

← Previous Page